Peterson Institute lobby
The Peterson Institute for International Economics is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan
research institution devoted to the study of international economic policy. More › ›
RSS News Feed Search

RealTime Economic Issues Watch

A website forum in which senior fellows of the Peterson Institute for International Economics discuss and debate their responses to global economic and financial developments as they occur each day and offer insights that others might overlook.

Archive: Posts Tagged ‘G-20’

Pittsburgh or Versailles? Will Italy and Germany have to pay the full bill of the global imbalances?

by Carlo Bastasin | October 7th, 2009 | 11:34 am

The agreement to coordinate global economic strategies was one of the most impressive achievements by the G-20 in Pittsburgh and at the IMF meeting in Istanbul. But without credible agreements on currency policies, that project could turn out to be very vulnerable, or even a Trojan horse allowing politically stronger [...]

Read full post

The G-20, the IMF, and Legitimacy

by Simon Johnson | September 29th, 2009 | 04:54 pm

Strong advocates of our new G-20 process are convinced that it will bring legitimacy to international economic policy discussions, rule-making, and crisis interventions. Certainly, it’s better than the G-7/G-8 pretending to run things—after all, who elected them?

But who elected the G-20? The answer is: no one. And, [...]

Read full post

G-20 Thinking: In the Medium Run We Are All Retired

by Simon Johnson | September 23rd, 2009 | 10:09 am

It looks like the G-20 on Friday will emphasize its new “framework” for curing macroeconomic imbalances, rather than any substantive measures to regulate banks, derivatives, or any other primary cause of the 2008–2009 financial crisis.

This is appealing to the G-20 leaders because their call to “rebalance” global [...]

Read full post

G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh, IMF Meeting: What to Expect?

by Simon Johnson | September 10th, 2009 | 12:35 pm

As we wade through a long line of international economic meetings—G-20 ministers of finance last week, G-20 heads of government in Pittsburgh coming up, IMF–World Bank governors meeting in Istanbul in early October (and all the associated “deputies” meetings, where the real work goes on)—it seems fair to ask: Where [...]

Read full post

Pittsburgh Priorities

by Edwin M. Truman | September 8th, 2009 | 12:39 pm

In less than three weeks, the G-20 leaders will meet in Pittsburgh for the third time in 10 months to discuss the global economic and financial crisis, prospects for recovery, and reforms of the global economic and financial system to limit the virulence of future crises. What do the leaders need to say to turn [...]

Read full post

German-American Economic Divergences on the Occasion of Merkel’s White House Visit

by Adam S. Posen | June 26th, 2009 | 01:25 pm

German Chancellor Angela Merkel will meet with President Obama today, June 26, in Washington to deepen US-German cooperation on economic, security, and climate-change issues. An unfortunate quote of mine to a German paper from some months back has been trotted out in the press to exemplify informed American skepticism on the German governing coalition’s economic [...]

Read full post

The “Washington Consensus”: Another Near-Death Experience?

by John Williamson | April 10th, 2009 | 09:55 am

Many times, since I first used the phrase in 1989, the “Washington Consensus” has been proclaimed dead, most recently by Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain at the press conference following the G-20 summit in London earlier this month. Yet most of the governments of the world seem to be determined to follow the precepts [...]

Read full post

The G-20 Communiqué: Relief for Eastern Europe

by Anders Aslund | April 3rd, 2009 | 01:32 pm

The Leaders’ statement from the London summit of April 2 is an improvement over the usual communiqués from international meetings by being much more concrete, readable, and substantial. It provides clear policy principles and specifies its agenda in sufficient detail.
For Central and Eastern Europe, this statement is likely to be particularly [...]

Read full post

The London G-20 Summit: Good But Not Great

by Morris Goldstein | April 3rd, 2009 | 09:36 am

The G-20 summit meeting in London, which ended on Thursday (April 2), produced a good result. It is premature to call it “a new Bretton Woods,” or a “new global order,” or even “a turning point”—but the leaders did much better than was expected only two months ago and they delivered on [...]

Read full post

The G-20 Communiqué: Tomorrow’s Another Day?

by Arvind Subramanian | April 2nd, 2009 | 02:57 pm

Judged against the low expectations before the G-20 meeting, the outcome of the London summit meeting was not too bad. The G-20 communiqué signaled one clear and important achievement: beefing up the resources of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) substantially and by agreeing to issue $250 billion in new Special [...]

Read full post